2009. A symbol is an object, action, or event that represents something or that creates a range of associations beyond itself. In literary works a symbol can express an idea, clarify meaning, or enlarge literal meaning. Select a novel or play and, focusing on one symbol, write an essay analyzing how that symbol functions in the work and what it reveals about the characters or themes of the work as a whole. Do not merely summarize the plot.
There are a lot of clumsy people in this world, so a character dropping something in a story shouldn’t mean anything, it’s just something that happens in life. But when analyzing a literary work you have to realize that everything means something. In Nella Larson’s Passing we see how simply dropping a teacup is a symbol, and thereby how it affects the work and discusses characters or themes.
One of the main characters in Passing, Irene, is hosting a small party when she notices her world is crumbling in around her. Her best friend, Clare, is talking to Irene’s husband Brian, when it clicks in her mind that they must be having an affair. We as the reader don’t know what it is that makes her think that, and we don’t know whether or not she’s right, but as she realizes it, she drops the teacup she’s holding. The teacup breaks instantly as it hits the floor, and we instantly realize it must be a symbol. The question is, what does it mean?
The broken teacup has a few different meanings, the first one reveals things about Irene’s mental stability. She had always trusted Brian and Clare but all of a sudden she thinks they’re having an affair. For the rest of the novel, Irene is changing. She is more jealous and suspicious, more malicious, and her thoughts become rather scrambled. For example, at the end of the novel Irene helps expose Clare’s race to her husband (he thought she was white when she was really a fair skinned black), which she knew was the most dangerous thing that could happen to Clare. And at the very end Clare falls, or jumps or was pushed, out of a window. We don’t know which it is, because Irene is our narrator and her thoughts have become amazingly jumbled.
The teacup reveals things about Carle as well as Irene. The teacup is porcelain, and when we think of porcelain we typically get an image of white porcelain. So the teacup also connects us to Clare because she is the only white character besides her husband. When the teacup falls from Irene’s hand and breaks we see foreshadowing of the end. The teacup is Clare, falling out of a window, breaking or dying.
When we look back at this we see that Larson didn’t leave an ambiguous ending as most people believe. She spells out the answer to everyone’s question. How did Clare fall? Did Irene push her out of jealousy and spite? Did she jump, trying to finally free herself from her self-constructed prison? Or did she fall, just slip, was it all a horrible accident? Larson tells the answer with the teacup. It is dropped by Irene, which shows us that Clare was pushed by Irene.
These things show us just how important symbols are to stories. They give us the answers we are desperately seeking, and are used to show us things about characters in the novel. So really, it’s never just a teacup.
Again, I think the thesis here could be a little more specific and provide a better outline for the rest of the essay. Good job analyzing the tea cup and its symbolism. A lot of times I don't notice symbols like that without them being pointed out to me, and I find it very interesting how Irene dropping the tea cup solves the mystery in the end of the story. I got a little confused in the last couple paragraphs, and I think it could have been organized a little differently. You say that Clare isn't really white, but fair-skinned black, and then go on to say that Clare is the only white character aside from her husband. Make sure you're clear in your thoughts and organize them well. Good job again!
ReplyDeleteIntro
ReplyDeleteYou should mention what the symbol is in the intro so that you can prove it later on in the essay. I'd switch the "or" in your last sentence to "and"
Paragraph 2
Sooo what you're saying is that when the cup broke, something in Irene broke too? Actually makes sense! Nice. Just try to say it plainly and lead the reader along with your thought process
Paragraph 3
I thought Clare was partially black?
Paragraph 4
But Clare is black not white and that dispels your entire theory! Maybe you should have started out with this paragraph and had it lead into the 2nd because in the 2nd you jumbled up the words a little and made an unnecessarily long sentence.
Overall
Is Passing a recognized work of literary merit? I've never heard of it! Sounds interesting though. I might have to go read it...
Would like to have seen some quotes in here to help prove your point!
Keep your facts straight pretty please! Don't change them to fit your own ends.
Intro
ReplyDeleteAgain, I should point out that the second sentence should generally provide background on what you proceed to reference in your thesis, so you can leave the summary out of the thesis and out of the essay in a general sense, yet here you seem to be responding to your opening sentence; you may wish to shorten both and integrate them together and repurpose the second sentence. You also do not mention why the teacup is a symbol, or how it got there, or what kind of symbol it is; while it is necessary to discuss this in the following paragraphs, the thesis outlines the logical structure by identifying the different logical premises you will later attempt to prove in order to obtain your conclusion, which is what symbol it represents exactly and 'what it reveals about the characters or themes of the work as a whole' and of course overall meaning. Also, symbols are typically represented as static objects and not actions, and while I'm sure you can go the alternate route, you ought to double check its viability with, say, the foster symbols section.
second+third paragraphs
These paragraphs do flow in a logical fashion, but I think you should condense them both into one paragraph, reduce the plot references (try to include only what is essential to proving the symbolic significance of the object in question, the teacup) because they do not bring enough explicitly outlined literary techniques to the table to qualify conclusions about what the author intended (what follows are mostly your conclusions regarding what you've read, which is fine if you are speaking to normal people, but the AP examiners seem to only understand rhetoric-based speech, e.g. literary techniques -> effect -> meaning)
final; you did a good job of relating what the teacup's significance to the cahracters is, but not the themes or work as a whole; you once again seem to bring up many questions, but do not discuss their relation to the overall meaning. An expansion on this would strengthen the piece, I think.